The issues we are going to talk in this part are slightly more technical compared to what we have discussed so far. Do not get alarmed, I will keep it simple—at least will try. If you think there is nothing technical about looking or sounding friendly then think again deeper until you come up with answers like your body language, personal space, routine calls, and occasional Hellooos and Hiiis, etc. It was about friendliness of a person, but when it comes to blogging we need to look for things like accessibility, soberness, etc. Read further to see what I mean.
Web hosting is cheaper and having a blog self-hosted is a big plus. No one likes a friend that piggyback on the benefits of others. One want a friend that can stand on his own and your self-hosted blog will give you that only. A self-hosted blog with a friendly name will make your blog more accessible
Note: (Gossimer offers the Ultimate web hosting with unlimited disk space, unlimited bandwidth, unlimited database, unlimited database space, unlimited email accounts, unlimited FTP users, and 99.9% uptime for just $5 a month only). Click here and get $50 in Yahoo Ad Credits as well to promote your website!
A person who has the maximum numbers of friend is the one who is found at all the hottest party. If you consider Google SERP (search engine result page) a party then being star of the party (the number one spot in organic result) will get you the maximum number of friends. A top-page ranking in Google and other search engines will make your instantly popular among people on the net.
I know you are a big fan of whoosh and swoosh of flash contents, but too many of them just distract because no one came to meet you to see how dazzling you are. Flash contents can be seen as showing off in the real life. How many real friends or would-be real friends got sold for your show offs?
Avoid Flash. No one likes show offs!
As I told you I may get a bit technical in this issue, but as I promised, I kept it as much non-technical as I could. Let me know what you think about you. Shed your inhibition and write whatever you feel like using the comment box below.
Tags: Body Language, Database Space, Email Accounts, Free Platform, Friendliness, google, gossimer, Maximum Number, Maximum Numbers, Other Search Engines, Personal Space, Piggyback, Platform Web, Real Friends, Search Engine Result, Show Offs, Star Of The Party, Swoosh, Unlimited Bandwidth, Whoosh
It is Binging all across the United States, and slightly less Googling and Yahooing. According to comScore qSearch study, people in the United States have shown inclination towards using Bing over Google and Yahoo in January 2009. Though the change was not significant statistically, it was symbolically. Google and Yahoo each has lost 0.3% user-base to Microsoft’s Bing that grew by 0.6% in the same month. The reference point for this data was December 2009. Despite its nominal rise, Bing is still at number 3 with 11.3% of the US search market pie, whereas, Google and Yahoo! is respectively on number 1 and 2. Google enjoys the trust of 65.4% US web users, whereas, 17% US net surfers have shown confidence in Yahoo SERP (Search Engine Result Pages). At number four was Ask Network, and at number five was AOL LLC network. Ask lost 0.1% market share, whereas, AOL LLC network gained 0.1% US search market share. (See image for complete report).
In a different study Wunderman, BrandAsset® Consulting, ZAAZ, and Compete found that search engine a web searcher usage to perform his search influences his view of the brand. The report has the following to say:
Bing users, for example, tend to be mostly from the tip of the adoption curve (innovators and early adopters) where Yahoo! and Google’s passengers tend to be middle majority [and] each search engine demonstrated different degrees of consumer engagement ranging from visiting to finally purchasing.
Tags: Adoption, Curve, Early Adopters, google, Google Yahoo, Inclination, Innovators, Market Share, Middle Majority, Number 1, Number 3, Reference Point, Search Engine Result, Search Market, Surfers, Web Searcher, Web Users, Yahoo Google, Yahoo Search, Zaaz
When I first heard the term “Google Slap” I couldn’t figure outs its head and tail. I had to do some research before I could understand the meaning of it. And today out of the blue this term popped up in my mind, so I thought to write about it only today. Have you heard of Google Slap?
Well, Google Slap is a financial penalty levied upon an advertiser who pulls visitors to his website that doesn’t have any quality content using Google Adwords campaign (Google’s PPC campaign). Sometimes Google so tightly slap the advertiser that it being a small business owner goes out of business. Actually, Google charges the maximum possible CPC (Cost per Click) rate, which is $10, if the landing page of the ad shown in its SERP (search engine result page) does not comply with the rule set by the search giant.
Does it sound like unfair practice?
Indeed it is. How can a vendor (that is what Google is for Adwords customers) dictate rule about how an advertiser should keep its website. Having content or not should be the PPC advertiser’s decision. He should not be arm-twisted to follow what Google has to say. But we are living in the world dominated by Google, so whatever it does in the name of empowering net users becomes rule, which everyone has to follow.
I am not against Google’s imposing its policy on indexing certain kinds of websites while leaving other either in sandbox or discarding it altogether because search bots is Google’s property and so is its database. Hence, Google is free to do whatever it wants, and make any rule that is necessary related to website’s indexing to please itself.
I have my objection to Google’s imposing its whim on to its customers (Adwords keyword buyers) because by selling keywords Google is not doing any favor to advertiser. Selling Adwords keyword is its business and the company is making money out of it. Similarly, an advertiser who owns his website is in there for profit motive, and he should be free to decide how his website should be.
Then who will decide the quality?
Customers, people who clicks on the ads. People are not too stupid to perceive the quality of the page they reach. Google does not need to be moral police (quality police to be more precise).
What do you think, isn’t Google acting like the Big Brother? Is it right in your opinion?
Tags: Advertiser, Cost Per Click, Cpc, Giant, google, Keyword, Keywords, Maximum, Objection, Out Of The Blue, Ppc, Profit Motive, Quality Content, Sandbox, Search Bots, Search Engine Result, Search Google, Small Business Owner, Unfair Practice, Whim